英語電影觀后感

　　阿甘正傳觀后感（中英文對照）

　　阿甘有自己的堅持，他不斷地跑步，JUST RUNS. 他跑步不為任何理由。他說:"人要往前看，千萬不要被過去拖累。我想我跑步就是這個意義”和過去告別，不停留在原處。也許這世界上太多人隨撥逐流，很少人會堅持做一件事，阿甘堅持自己的堅持，于是他成了“神”。影片中還有一位主要人物是上校丹。他在越南戰(zhàn)爭中失去了雙腿。他說他的命運就是戰(zhàn)死。然而阿甘卻救他，讓他活了下來。失去雙腿后他開始憎恨生活，生活得很頹廢，責怪阿甘當初救了他。然而當他調整心態(tài)，去和阿甘一起捕魚生活，有了收獲后，開始感覺到生活的美好。感謝阿甘當初就了他。影片試圖通過這個角色告訴觀者生活總是美好的。烏云后有彩虹，絕境后有重生。關鍵是看我們給不給自己一個好心態(tài)，一個機會去改變不好的現(xiàn)狀。影片試圖向觀者傳達這樣一個信息：或許做好我們該做的每一件事，生活就會給我們一個好的回饋。只要有一種堅持就會出現(xiàn)一個奇跡。

　　Mr. A Gan has his own perseverance, keeping on running without of any reason, JUST RUNS.

　　He said: “Man has t look forward, and never encumbered by foretime. I thank that's the

　　meaning of my running.” Say goodbye to foretime and don't stay in-place. Although so many

　　people in the world are used to follow others and few people can stick to one thing,

　　Mr. A Gan does and becomes “GOD”. There is another character Captain Dan. Dan lost his

　　legs in Vietnarm War. He said that his fate is death in war. However, Mr. A Gan saved him

　　and let him be alive. After losing legs, Dan was decadent and disgusted with life,

　　complaining that A Gan shouldn't save him. When he adjusted his mind, living on fishing

　　with A Gan, he started to enjoy the wonderful life and thank A Gan's help. The movie is

　　intended to tell people that life is wonderful by this character. Rainbow is always

　　after cloud. The key point is that whether we have a good mind and an opportunity to

　　ourselves to change bad situation. The movie is also sent such a message to us: do

　　well what we should do, and life will return us well. There will be a miracle if

　　only there is perseverance.

　　Ice Age 冰河世紀 英語影評

　　It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 2001’s rollicking success, I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen. What is surprising, is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s, Inc.'s second rate, half wit cousin.

　　Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen. This time, it’s the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man. Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot. But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home.

　　Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen. Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. It’s like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Actually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for.

　　Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one liners. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that we’re going for here, then I suppose I’m all for it. But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation. Frankly, I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters. The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living, breathing, creatures. It’s laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts at heartfelt, soft touches.

　　Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result, what slapstick there is, is highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation.

　　The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost laughably bad animation. The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos. Ice Age’s comedy is worthy of Bugs, but unless you’re under 5, you’ll be bored with everything else.

　　《冒牌天神2》觀后感:

　　This should've gone straight to video. Evan Almighty was not able to manage the expectations of those who came to see it anticipating as riotous a ride as its predecessor Bruce Almighty. It retained the premise of the original as a spin-off but it doesn't work not because Steve Carell is less talented than Jim Carrey but because he had lousy material to work with. Even Morgan Freeman (who reprises his role as God) lost the zing and impressive qualities he had in the first installment.

　　Evan Almighty apparently targets a family audience with its decidedly more religious overtones (check out what ARK really means), so it shouldn't have attempted to fool the audience by maintaining the Almighty franchise because it doesn't fit; its brand of humor and story simply failed to keep up.

　　It would've probably done better if it were marketed differently instead of lazily riding on the success of Bruce Almighty when it painfully couldn't deliver the same punches.