Cars and Bicycles-小轎車(chē)與自行車(chē),Cars and Bicycles-小轎車(chē)與
Cars and Bicycles-小轎車(chē)與自行車(chē)
Cars and Bicycles
Cars and bicycles are similar in that they are both privately owned means of transport.
However, there are a lot of differences between them. A car costs a lot more to buy than a bicycle. In addition, it is far more expensive to run. For example, a car has to be insured,and must be served regularly~ further more, spare parts for a car cost a lot of money. A car uses petrol, which is expensive,where as a bicycle uses only human energy.
On the other hand, as far as comfort is concerned, a car is better than a bicycle. In a car you are protected from the weather, and have comfortable seats and plenty of room to carry people and luggage.
A car is not only more comfortable than a bicycle, it is faster as well.
With respect to convenience, it is difficult to say which one is better. A bicycle is certainly easier to park!
So it is difficult to make a choice. In my opinion, if you can afford it, you'd better buy both a car and a bicycle. It will be very convenient.
[點(diǎn)評(píng)]
文章主要用對(duì)比的手法羅列了小轎車(chē)與自行車(chē)的不同之處，但卻難說(shuō)誰(shuí)好誰(shuí)壞。作者很會(huì)折中：若能買(mǎi)得起還是都買(mǎi)上。論述有條有理，結(jié)尾觀點(diǎn)巧妙。
[參考譯文]
小轎車(chē)與自行車(chē)
小轎車(chē)和自行車(chē)相同的地方在于它們都是私人擁有的交通工具。
不過(guò)，它們也有許多不同之處。買(mǎi)一輛小轎車(chē)比買(mǎi)一輛自行車(chē)要貴得多，而使用它要花的錢(qián)則更多。比如，小轎車(chē)要上保險(xiǎn)，還必須時(shí)常護(hù)理，加之，小轎車(chē)的零部件也相當(dāng)費(fèi)錢(qián)。小轎車(chē)要用昂貴的汽油，而自行車(chē)只用人的體力。
從另一方面來(lái)講，就舒服程度而言，小轎車(chē)比自行車(chē)要好得多。在小轎車(chē)?yán)�，你可以躲避風(fēng)吹日曬，你有舒適的座位，充足的地方載人帶物。
小轎車(chē)不僅比自行車(chē)舒服，而且也快得多。
就方便來(lái)說(shuō)，很難說(shuō)哪個(gè)更好。當(dāng)然自行車(chē)停放要容易些!
所以，很難做一選擇。依我看，若能買(mǎi)得起，最好把小轎車(chē)和自行車(chē)都買(mǎi)上。這樣會(huì)非常方便的。
Cars and Bicycles-小轎車(chē)與自行車(chē)